Apologetics and the Defense of Evil Yahweh’s Lies and Violence

Apologetics is a defence of the Evil Christian god Yahweh

Apologetics is the practice of defending religious beliefs, especially in Christianity. Consequently, believers use empty arguments, lies, and false evidence to explain why they think their faith is true.

Apologists actively defend the Evil god Yahweh and justify his brutal violence. They try to persuade believers and non-believers that Evil, violence, and suffering are good. For them, suffering is the Way to god, so they accept it with both hands and on their knees. Their goal is to convince others—and sometimes even themselves—that Christianity makes sense.

Apologetics is a failed attempt to prove unprovable

The Christian theologians could not prove there was a god, not even by violence. They invented apologetics as a way of proving the unprovable, alongside god and Jesus.

In my new Book Series, “It’s Finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist The FIRST valid EVIDENCE in History” I proved that god does NOT exist because that is impossible. https://god-doesntexist.com/

Christian Evil: How Believers Defend the Indefensible

Out of 38 answers to the Quora question “What helped you accept religious texts as fallible human documents?«, I have chosen two that perfectly represent Christian Evil and the apologetics of the defence of this Lie and Violence.

Apologetics vs. Reality: How Reading the Bible Led Me to Question My Faith

1. Michael R. Burch, Owner at Alpha Omega Consulting Group (company) (1980–present)

“I was a devout christian … until I read the bible from cover to cover.

The first thing that struck me was that all the christians I knew, including my entire immediate family and large extended family, were convinced that the biblical god was good, and yet it was obvious to me that Yahweh was hideously evil, a mass-murderer of children, toddlers, infants, babies and their mothers.

The more of the bible I read, the more errors I found.

But none of the many errors I found compared to the sheer, malignant evil of Yahweh.

When I pointed out the evils I saw to my mother, who studied the bible religiously (pardon the pun) every day of her life, with a library full of concordances and commentaries, she would read a verse in which Yahweh commanded slavery (which she abhorred) but a minute later she was convinced that the verse in question didn’t exist.

So I had to accept that not only was the bible an incredibly fallible and evil document, but that something in the christian brain refuses to believe what the bible’s evil verses so clearly say.

Moses clearly commanded that boys should be stoned to death for misdemeanors and that girls should be stoned to death for being raped and for not bleeding on their wedding nights (around 40% of girls don’t bleed the first time they have sex, and of course no one should be stoned to death for any reason).

I see the same strange mindset here on Quora. Indoctrinated christians refuse to believe that evil is evil when the biblical god does or commands evil things.

Fallible texts and indoctrinated minds incapable of thinking clearly and independently explain the many horrors created by the christian religion:

• Women being burned at the stake as witches.
• Rabid christians torturing and burning each other at the stake over points of dogma.
• Slavery
• Ethnic cleansing
• Genocide
• So-called “holy wars”
• Inquisitions
• Racism
• Sexism
• Homophobia
• etc.

The christian religion still flourishes because indoctrinated minds cannot tell good from evil. Were christians gypped in the Garden of Eden by their god?«

The Christian logic of illogic

Here is a perfect intro into the Christian logic of illogic, which is the trademark of apologetics.

»Pastor Peter LaRuffa saying how if the bible said in it that 2 + 2 = 5, I wouldn’t question it, i would accept it cos it’s in the bible, then do my best to work it out”

My remark is ”You Can’t reason with a brain/mind like that” Insanity!«

Source: »If The Bible Said 2+2=5, I Would Believe It” (You Can’t Reason With A Brain Like That)«, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmAewBTf8tg

Believers pervert fiction into reality and with it truth into falsehood, Good into Evil, and logic into nonsense. According to the karmic formula, they constantly claim that Good is Evil, or that A is B, which of course is not true. The logic is very simple:

1. A is A, B is B,

2. A is not B and B is not A,

3. White is white and black is black.

4. White is not black and black is not white.

This is clear to all but the religious, who have been so brainwashed by the karmic agenda that they believe the reverse and the opposite.

Apologetics 101: How Christians Reinterpret the Bible to Fit Their Beliefs

2. Marcus Ichabod, Exposing dirty and dishonest bible fiddling apologetics

“I think what’s going on here is the Christian brain contains an “internal model” of Christianity acquired over many sermons, study, prayer, anecdotes, hearsay and random thoughts

This “internal model of Christianity” is distinct for each Christian, some are sophisticated models others are simple. They might vary a lot on obscure matters such as pre or post tribulation rapture. More significant differences such as Unitarian or Trinitarian tend to split into denominations or sects.

All of these Christians suffer cognitive dissonance when their “internal model” is demonstrated to conflict with the bible. They will seek to conform the Bible to whatever their internal model is by means of re-imagining the text any way they choose using one or more methods below.

Apologetics 101

1. the verses you do happen to like are definitely literal for sure
2. the verses you don’t like are figurative
3. the verses you don’t like are deprecated
4. the verses you don’t like are translation errors
5. the verses you don’t like are mysterious
6. the verses you don’t like are parables
7. the verses you don’t like are euphemisms
8. the verses you don’t like are not for the current dispensation
9. the verses you don’t like are only partial and progressive revelation
10. the verses you don’t like only apply to a particular time, culture, ethnic group or geography
11. the verses you don’t like clearly do not mean what they very fcuking clearly say

Try this method on these scriptures. First decide if you happen to like a scripture then dispose of the ones you don’t like using one or more excuses. If you get stuck, just go straight to 11.«

Unused Daughter for sale, or swap for new chariot. “When a man sells his daughter as a slave, she will not be freed at the end of six years as the men are. 8 If she does not satisfy her owner, he must allow her to be bought back again. – Exodus 21:7-11

 

Source: https://www.quora.com/What-helped-you-accept-religious-texts-as-fallible-human-documents

The Law of Apologetics is simple: Deny, lie, and manipulate. Then, obsessively persuade others that you are moral like your god, being “the objective standard of morality”.

The Apologetics Struggle: Fighting to Keep Fiction Alive

The apologetics struggle to defend religion, and to defend god as a real being is thus a struggle for truth and reality. Religion and faith only exist in mythological fiction, so apologists desperately strain to connect fiction and factual reality.

For them, fiction is reality, and they fight for it against the common sense of the atheists who separate the lie from the truth and thus threaten them greatly.

The religious want to remain delusional like drunkards in a drunken stupor, and so they fight desperately for their bottle of the miraculous biblical potion that keeps them in a religious delirium. As a result, they resist any rational challenges to their faith.

The Inevitable Collapse of Faith: Why Apologetics Can’t Save Religion

Apologists have lost the battle for delusion before they even began. In the long run, they have no chance of turning fiction into reality, let alone proving the existence of god. With more and more people abandoning their faith, they have to fight harder and harder to keep the faithful, whose faith is already extremely weak, small, and shallow. In turn, this intensifies their apologetic efforts.

This makes their threats of hell more and more heated and shrill and their voices more and more hysterical. They are losing their fight for god, for religion, for faith and fiction as false history.

Apologists will inevitably lose their battle until the last god-fearing believer rises from his submissive knees, removes the cross of wrath, and embraces freedom as an independent being.

Apologetics: The Irrational Defense of Religion and Delusion

Apologetics irrationally attempt to rationalize the irrational. Or, to put it in more homely terms, it irrationally attempts to present the irrational as rational.

Apologetics go so far as to rationalize religion by claiming that the religious are supposed to have reason from god and that religion is god’s reason.

Non-believers are supposed to have only a brain in which stimuli are automatically and uncontrollably jumping around, which makes them incapable of knowing anything for certain, lacking in objective morality, and irrational.

Or to put it more bluntly, believers are supposed to be rational, and non-believers irrational, which is the opposite of the truth.

Rationality is true, intelligible, verifiable, provable, and good for the Good Man and the Good Society, as opposed to religion and believers who are irrational, magical, superstitious, and religious. The rational people live in actual reality, while the unreasonable are lost in mythological and religious delusions.

Apologetics: A Desperate Attempt to Silence Doubts and Maintain the Faith

Apologists desperately attempt to silence their own loud, constant, and very unpleasant justified doubts about the reality of myth. Their doubts are their common sense speaking to them from a distance, which they have driven out of their minds and let in and inhabited by the nonsense that now pretends to be clever.

Under the guise of defending the faith against external threats, it is about the self-convincing, self-promoting “rationalization” and magical procedures to “prove god”. The greater their fear that they have been deceived, that they are living a lie, and that they will eventually see that there is no god, the more apologetic they need.

That is why the very famous apologists William Craig Lane and Frank Turek always say “I believe” and “I think”, not “I know”. They cannot say that because they don’t know, they just guess and assume and pretend as if faith is already a reality.

Apologetics is just a cheap marketing

Thus, the apologists, on the basis of “proofs” to the faithful and especially to those with weak faith, try to strengthen their faith and keep them further in the fold. They are afraid that the faithful will take the money to the unfaithful or otherwise faithful, and they will have to start living like poor churchmen.

Apologetics, like cheap marketing, is also aimed at unbelievers to convert them to the faith. It tries to make itself look more real, serious, and even scientific to attract as many atheists as possible and convert them into sheep to finance their deception.

Defending Fiction, Lies, and the Evil of a Non-Existent god

Apologists pretend to understand god, to know his secrets and secret plans, and, as his advocates, reveal them to the world. In doing so, they also believe in themselves, even though god has not uttered a single word since the karmicons invented him.

Since he does not exist, he cannot defend himself and confirm or deny apologetic statements. The Bible does not contain their statements because they are not “official” or “of god”.

They are just their opinions and nothing else, and yet they have no evidence for them. Even apologetic fiction is just a matter of faith: whether you believe in them or not.

Apologists also defend and uphold Evil, lying, psychopathic, sadistic gods and the Church as a criminal and terrorist organization. Apart from the physical violence of the crusaders, conquistadors, and inquisitors and their violent and bloody struggles against non-believers, it is a theoretical defense of the faith.

This long-standing tradition can be explored in more detail on Wikipedia’s apologetics page.

The Void-Filling Lies Defending the Non-Existence of god

Faith is a giant hole, in the center of which yawns the Hole of all holes, that is god.

Apologetics seeks to fill this void with lies, stupidity, and nonsense. It even tries to present the Lie of god as the Truth or the Holy Truth by absurd fabrications. Here again, we see the absurdity and impotence of apologetics. If god existed, there would be no need for apologetics. Since there is no god, apologetics exists. Despite their efforts over thousands of years, they have not succeeded to this day in proving that there is a god. There is no valid proof of god’s existence, of himself, alive and present.

Apologetics itself is proof that Christianity has no proof for the existence of god, so it must defend this Holy Hole with arms and the Word. Apologetics is proof that god does not exist. If there were a god, apologetics would not be necessary. The defense of the faith is proof that Christianity does not work. What an “omnipotent” god it is that he cannot make another religion work without defense and apologetics.

The Failure of Apologetics: Defending the Indefensible and Proving god’s Non-Existence

Apologetics, at its core, is a desperate attempt to rationalize the irrational and defend the indefensible. It seeks to fill the vast void left by the absence of a tangible, verifiable god with fabricated justifications, lies, and contradictions. For centuries, apologists have struggled to prove the existence of god, but their inability to provide concrete evidence only serves to highlight the truth: if god truly existed, there would be no need for apologetics.

As we’ve seen throughout history, apologetics has been used to defend violence, deceit, and the worship of a mythical being. It has justified atrocities and perpetuated ignorance, all in the name of maintaining faith in a god that cannot be proven to exist. The very existence of apologetics is proof of its failure. If god existed, his presence would be self-evident, and there would be no need for endless arguments to defend him.

In conclusion, apologetics is not a path to truth or enlightenment but a mechanism to prop up a belief system built on myth, violence, and deception. It cannot provide real evidence for the existence of god, and it ultimately serves as a defense of the indefensible. As more people question their faith and seek truth beyond the confines of religion, apologetics will continue to crumble under the weight of its own contradictions.

Fantastic future after the end of the Earth’s blockade

Read more about the work of the new Cosmic Administration, the end of all religions, and the awesome future of Earth after the end of the planetary blockade in my new Book Series: It’s finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist The FIRST valid EVIDENCE in History.

After millennia of speculation, assumptions, and false beliefs, we now have irrefutable evidence: God Does NOT Exist because that is impossible.

The Biggest SECRET in Human History is Finally REVEALED. The truth will liberate atheists from religious and right-wing hatred, violence, and terror. It will help believers sober up, escape their religious delusions, and live in common sense.

You deserve to KNOW.

https://god-doesntexist.com/

FAQ: Apologetics and the Defense of the Evil Mythical god

1. What is apologetics?

Apologetics is the practice of defending religious beliefs, particularly in Christianity. It involves using arguments, reasoning, and explanations to justify the existence of god, often relying on fabricated logic, misinterpretations, or contradictions to defend the faith.

2. Why do apologists defend the existence of god?

Apologists defend the existence of god because they believe in the teachings of Christianity. However, their arguments are often based on assumptions, faith, and an unwillingness to confront the lack of tangible evidence for god’s existence.

3. Does apologetics prove the existence of god?

No, apologetics does not provide valid proof of god’s existence. The arguments used by apologists are often based on personal belief, circular reasoning, or misinterpretation of religious texts, and they fail to provide concrete, verifiable evidence for god’s reality.

4. How does apologetics rationalize the irrational?

Apologetics attempts to present irrational concepts, such as the existence of a mythical being or the justification of violence in the name of god, as rational. This is done by fabricating explanations or dismissing contradictions in religious texts as metaphorical or mysterious, all in an effort to make faith seem reasonable.

5. What is the relationship between apologetics and the absence of proof for god?

The very existence of apologetics is proof that there is no tangible, verifiable evidence for god. If god truly existed, there would be no need for endless arguments and defenses to prove his existence. Apologetics exists because there is no solid evidence for the reality of god. Therefore, believers must resort to endless justifications to maintain their faith.

6. How does apologetics defend the violence in religious texts?

Apologetics often defends the violence and brutality depicted in religious texts by claiming that these actions were justified by god, or that the context of the time made them necessary. However, this defense ignores the immorality and contradictions within these texts, relying on faith-based rationalizations rather than objective reasoning.

7. Why is apologetics considered a failure?

Apologists fail because they do not provide real, convincing evidence for god’s existence. Instead, it is an ongoing attempt to defend a belief system based on myths, contradictions, and unverifiable claims. The absence of proof and the reliance on faith-based arguments show that apologetics cannot successfully uphold the validity of Christianity.

8. What is the ultimate conclusion about apologetics?

The ultimate conclusion is that apologetics is an irrational and futile attempt to defend the indefensible. It cannot prove the existence of god and only serves to perpetuate religious delusion and ignorance. If god truly existed, there would be no need for apologetics, and faith would not require such extensive defense.