MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: Projection, Control, and Delusion Beyond the Charlie Kirk Case
MAGA’s psychological warfare against Charlie Kirk critics exposes systematic patterns of narcissistic projection, authoritarian control, and religious delusion that extend far beyond one assassination case. Following Kirk’s death, MAGA supporters simultaneously collected his controversial statements while denying that he authored them. This contradiction reveals the same psychological mechanisms operating throughout the entire movement.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: Summary
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare against Charlie Kirk critics reveals a complex pattern of unconscious defense mechanisms, cult-like behavior, and grief processing dysfunction.
Following Kirk’s assassination, MAGA supporters began systematically collecting negative social media statements about their deceased hero, creating enemy lists while simultaneously denying that Kirk authored his most controversial quotes.
This contradictory behavior demonstrates classic psychoanalytic patterns, including projection, splitting, and reaction formation, combined with grief stages stuck in denial and anger.
Through Freudian, Lacanian, and Jungian analysis, plus comparison with historical cases, this phenomenon exposes how political movements weaponize psychological manipulation during crisis periods.
How Hatred Turns Inward: Evil’s Corrosion of MAGA from Within
After Perplexity presents the current situation, I will reveal how hatred toward others allows Evil to poison and corrode MAGA from within.
First, let’s see the source of the Evil MAGA hatred and their internal schizophrenic split. I noticed a common defensive-aggressive pattern of religious believers repeating in the CK case.
Biblical Compartmentalization: The Psychological Blueprint Behind MAGA’s Defense of Charlie Kirk
The psychological warfare tactics employed by MAGA supporters after Charlie Kirk’s death mirror a long-standing pattern found in religious fundamentalism. It is particularly visible among believers who confront contradictions in the Bible.
When faced with conflicting or morally troubling passages, many believers engage in compartmentalization. They deny the contradiction exists, or aggressively project blame onto critics who point it out. This schizophrenic split between conscious belief and unconscious recognition creates a fragile psychological structure that must be defended at all costs. The result is a paradoxical mindset where truth becomes threatening, and those who speak it are labeled enemies.
This same mechanism is now visible in MAGA’s response to Charlie Kirk’s legacy. Supporters collect and archive his controversial statements while simultaneously denying he ever made them. They lash out at critics who quote Kirk’s own words. Not because the quotes are false, but because they expose a painful truth that the movement cannot consciously accept.
Just as religious believers defend scripture by attacking those who question it, MAGA followers defend their ideological scripture, Kirk’s rhetoric, by targeting those who reveal its contradictions.
The psychological blueprint of denial and projection, perfected in religious orthodoxy, now fuels political orthodoxy and internal aggression within the MAGA movement.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare Begins With Understanding Defense Mechanisms
MAGA’s psychological warfare tactics following Charlie Kirk’s death reveal sophisticated unconscious processes operating beneath seemingly irrational behavior. Supporters simultaneously collect Kirk’s controversial statements while denying that he authored them. They create comprehensive enemy databases targeting critics who quote Kirk’s own documented words.
This behavior demonstrates textbook psychological warfare principles. According to military psychological operations doctrine, effective psyops involve “competition over narrative, ideas, and social control”. MAGA supporters unconsciously employ these tactics to maintain ideological control after losing their primary spokesperson.
The contradiction exposes deep psychological conflict. They recognize Kirk’s statements were harmful,l yet cannot consciously acknowledge this truth. Consequently, they transform shame into an aggressive hunt for “enemies” who merely quoted their “hero’s” documented positions.
Read the full story behind this karmic unraveling in Who Really Killed Charlie Kirk: Senad Dizdarevic Reveals the Shocking Karmic Truth Behind the Assassination, and learn the truth that Charlie was first murdered in heaven, and only then killed on Earth.
Freudian Analysis: Unconscious Defense Mechanisms in Political Crisis
Projection and Reaction Formation
Projection occurs when people attribute their own unacceptable thoughts to others.
MAGA supporters unconsciously recognize that Kirk’s statements were extremist and harmful. However, they cannot accept this reality directly. Therefore, they project their guilt onto critics who quote these statements.
Reaction formation transforms unacceptable impulses into their opposite.
Their shame about Kirk’s documented hatred becomes aggressive righteousness against anyone acknowledging these quotes. They feel guilty about supporting extremism, so they attack those who expose it.
Splitting and Idealization
Splitting divides the world into absolute Good and Evil categories, preventing integration of complex reality.
Kirk becomes the idealized Good Object who can do no wrong. Critics become persecuting bad objects who must be destroyed.
This primitive defense mechanism prevents psychological integration. They cannot process that their hero held both positive and negative qualities. Instead, all negativity gets projected onto external enemies.
Intellectualization and Grandiosity
Intellectualization transforms emotional conflicts into abstract philosophical discussions.
They cannot emotionally process Kirk’s actual statements, so they create elaborate rationalizations about “context” and “misunderstanding.”
Narcissistic grandiosity appears in their “pearls before swine” mentality.
They think they alone possess a true understanding of Kirk’s meaning. Critics represent inferior masses unworthy of enlightenment.
Lacanian Perspective: Symbolic Order Under Threat
Master Signifier Collapse
In Lacanian theory, the Master Signifier anchors symbolic reality.
Kirk functioned as MAGA’s Master Signifier: the central organizing principle for their entire worldview. His death threatens complete symbolic collapse.
Negative statements about Kirk represent jouissance: traumatic enjoyment breaking through their carefully constructed fantasy. These quotes reveal the “Real”: the kernel of truth their ideology cannot symbolize.
Or, in other words: In Lacanian terms, a Master Signifier holds a group’s shared reality together. For MAGA, Charlie Kirk played that role; he was the central figure around whom their worldview was built. His death threatens to unravel that symbolic structure.
When critics quote Kirk’s most controversial statements, it breaks through MAGA’s fantasy and exposes a painful truth they can’t fully process. These quotes trigger discomfort because they reveal what their ideology tries to hide.
Big Other Restoration Attempts
The Big Other represents symbolic authority that validates meaning. Enemy list compilation attempts to restore this Big Other by creating an illusion that symbolic authority still exists. If they can eliminate critics, they can maintain their symbolic universe.
Their fury stems from confronting gaps in the symbolic order. Kirk’s documented statements create holes in their ideological fabric that cannot be repaired through normal symbolic means.
Or, in other words: The “Big Other” is a symbol of authority that gives meaning and structure to a group’s beliefs. By compiling enemy lists, MAGA supporters try to restore that sense of control, creating the illusion that their worldview still holds together. They believe that by silencing critics, they can protect their ideological system.
Their anger comes from facing cracks in that system. Kirk’s documented statements expose uncomfortable truths that don’t fit their narrative. These gaps can’t be patched with usual explanations, so they respond with denial and aggression to defend their fragile belief structure.
Object Petit A and Desire
Kirk’s statements functioned as objet petit a: the cause of their desire.
These quotes simultaneously attracted and repelled them. Losing control over interpretation means losing their fundamental organizing principle.
Jungian Analysis: Shadow Projection and Archetypal Possession
Shadow Projection Mechanisms
The Shadow contains disowned aspects of personality. MAGA supporters cannot integrate Kirk’s documented extremism into their conscious self-image. Therefore, critics must carry this Shadow burden through projection.
Enemy lists represent shadow catching on a massive scale. Each critic becomes a container for projected shame about supporting documented hatred and extremism.
Archetypal Patterns and Inflation
Their behavior activates the archetypal pattern of the persecuted tribe. Kirk becomes the sacrificial hero-king murdered by demonic forces. Critics transform into evil entities threatening the collective.
This archetypal possession overrides rational thinking. They experience inflation – identification with the Self archetype. They believe they possess divine truth, while critics represent inferior darkness.
Mapping Psychological Defense Mechanisms onto MAGA Behavior
Freud and the Return of Repression
- Freudian projection: MAGA often accuses others of what it suppresses in itself.
- Example: Claims that Democrats are “rigging elections” mirror MAGA-aligned efforts at voter suppression and gerrymandering. (The manipulation of an electoral constituency’s boundaries to favour one party or class. —Dictionary)
- Freudian denial: Refusing to accept painful truths.
- Example: The refusal to acknowledge Biden’s legitimate 2020 win despite over 60 court rulings affirming it.
Lacan and the Collapse of the Master Signifier
- Lacanian theory explains how movements coalesce around a “Master Signifier” — a figure or phrase that anchors meaning.
- Example: Charlie Kirk became such a signifier for MAGA, embodying “truth” and “patriotism.” His fall from grace sparked denial and frantic efforts to rewrite his image.
The contradictions — preserving his words while denying he said them — show how unstable the signifier is, collapsing under its own contradictions.
Jung and the Collective Shadow
- Jungian psychology reveals how groups project their denied characteristics onto outsiders.
- Example: MAGA’s portrayal of Democrats, immigrants, and journalists as inherently corrupt reflects a collective shadow — trait disowned but alive within the movement itself.
These shadow dynamics create cycles of paranoia, outrage, and repeated scapegoating.
Enemy Lists and Cult Dynamics
Psychoanalytic theory also notes how fragile egos externalize danger by creating enemy lists. MAGA amplifies this through constant attacks on the “fake news media,” “globalists,” and “RINOs.”
(“Republican in name only” is a pejorative used to describe politicians of the Republican Party deemed insufficiently loyal to the party. —Wikipedia)
These tactics mirror cult-like mechanisms of control: silencing dissent, building fear, and demanding loyalty.
Conclusion
MAGA’s strategies are not random. They mirror Freudian defense mechanisms, Lacanian master signifier collapse, and Jungian shadow projection, while also replaying karmic patterns of bondage and denial.
As Senad Dizdarević argues in MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: The Charlie Kirk Case Reveals Deeper Pathology In Far-Right, recognizing these dynamics is essential to dismantling the psychological warfare at the heart of far-right extremism.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare – The Sacredness of Charlie Kirk: MAGA’s Ritual Defense Against Heresy
Before we continue with MAGA’s drama, you must understand that their obsessive fight to preserve Charlie Kirk’s legacy, especially through his quotes, is a symbolic attempt to keep him and his voice alive. They couldn’t prevent his death, so they now protect his words from so-called “enemies.”
When leftists present these quotes, or in MAGA’s language, “God forbid,” dare to speak them aloud, it’s perceived as a corruption, a symbolic killing of their hero. Only MAGA is allowed to speak his words directly; everyone else is accused of spitting them out heretically, blasphemously, and sacrilegiously.
They fiercely forbid leftists from “taking the Lord’s name in vain,” placing Charlie on a metaphorical cross and declaring him untouchable to the untouchables.
Worse still, in their eyes, leftists quoting Charlie Kirk are not just committing heresy: they’re worshipping Satan: The Dark Lord of Evil, Hell, and Eternal Damnation.
With their irrational fight against the left for presenting Charlie Kirk’s quotes, MAGA supporters believe they are battling Satan himself. In their symbolic worldview, the left or “Satan” is trying to steal Charlie’s “Voice of Life”, snatching him from Jesus in heaven and dragging him into hell.
This spiritualized MAGA Drama transforms political discourse into cosmic warfare, where quoting Kirk becomes an act of desecration, and defending him is a holy crusade.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare Through Five-Stage Grief Analysis
Stage One: Denial and Isolation
Denial appears in refusing to accept that Kirk actually made documented statements. They claim quotes are “taken out of context” or “misunderstood” despite clear text and video evidence.
Isolation manifests through retreating into echo chambers that reinforce their version of reality. They avoid confronting evidence that challenges their idealized Kirk image.
Stage Two: Anger and Aggression
Anger targets anyone acknowledging Kirk’s documented positions. Instead of processing grief about their hero’s extremism, they redirect rage toward critics and journalists.
This anger serves multiple psychological functions:
1. It provides an illusion of control during helplessness.
2. It channels overwhelming emotions into manageable targets.
3. It maintains group cohesion through shared enemy identification.
Stage Three: Bargaining for Control
Bargaining appears in their belief that controlling information controls reality. If they eliminate negative statements, they can magically restore Kirk’s reputation.
They negotiate with reality by creating elaborate explanations for Kirk’s statements. They seek to change circumstances retroactively through reinterpretation and contextualization.
Stage Four: Depression (Unconscious)
Depression remains largely unconscious but drives frantic activity. Underlying despair about their hero’s genuine extremism fuels desperate attempts to restore his image.
This depression cannot be acknowledged directly without destroying their worldview. Instead, it manifests through hyperactivity and aggressive list-making.
Stage Five: Acceptance (Not Reached)
Acceptance has not occurred because it would require integrating Kirk’s complexity. They cannot accept he was both charismatic and extremist without fundamental worldview reconstruction.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: Historical Case Study Comparisons
Case Study 1: Jonestown Survivors and Jim Jones
Following the Jonestown massacre, surviving followers exhibited similar patterns to MAGA’s Kirk response. They denied that Jones ordered the murders despite overwhelming evidence. Moreover, they created elaborate explanations blaming external enemies. They projected their shame onto critics who exposed Jones’s documented abuses.
Like MAGA supporters, Jonestown survivors could not integrate their leader’s complexity. They maintained splitting between idealized Jones and persecuting enemies rather than accepting uncomfortable truths.
Case Study 2: Nixon Supporters During Watergate
During the Watergate scandal, Nixon supporters demonstrated identical psychological patterns. They denied clear evidence while attacking journalists and investigators. They claimed persecution by liberal media rather than acknowledging Nixon’s documented crimes.
The same projection mechanisms operated: unconscious recognition of wrongdoing transformed into aggression against truth-tellers. Enemy identification preserved group cohesion during crisis.
Case Study 3: Celebrity Fan Cults After Scandals
When beloved celebrities face scandal exposure, fan communities exhibit parallel behaviors. They deny documented evidence while creating elaborate conspiracy theories about persecution. They attack victims and whistleblowers rather than processing uncomfortable truths about their idols.
The psychological patterns remain consistent across contexts: splitting, projection, and reality denial serve to preserve idealized images against contradictory evidence.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: Source of MAGA Evil
Before we continue with the MAGA self-destructing lies, manipulations, and violence, here is an excellent explanation of far-right source trauma:
“The MAGA movement didn’t just win an election, the judiciary, and the legislative branches; they successfully externalized their inner world. They built a fortress of policy and rhetoric that mirrors their psychological state: one of paranoia, repression, rigid hierarchy, punishment, and a desperate need for control. And now, they are forced to live inside it. The rage we see is the agony of a psyche confronting its own reflection and recoiling in horror. They hate the world they built, but they cannot admit they are its architects. So they blame everyone else.”
Source: The Unconscious Roots of MAGA Rage: Why Winning Feels Like Losing, https://medium.com/@elizabethrosehalligan/the-unconscious-roots-of-maga-rage-why-winning-feels-like-losing-1ea22ccb8d72
The author of the above article, who does not know about the Karmic Organization, incarnations, and prewritten scripts for our lives, says that “Trauma isn’t just a story, then. It’s a biological inheritance.”
That is not true, our lives are part of the Karmic Story, and have nothing to do with biology and genes being guilty for MAGA’s evil. It is the karmic program; they have been programmed to be evil.
She continues with: “They believe they are fighting liberals, immigrants, and ‘wokeism.” In truth, they are fighting their own ghosts.”
This sounds good, but in fact, they are fighting other people’s wars, the karmic ones. The karmicons programmed them to hate others, while at the same time, they crawl in their own swamp of hatred.
How to Deprogram Karmic Evil and Rebuild a Loving Self?
Luckily, it is possible to deprogram and eliminate the karmic evil ghosts.
Use my exercises for awakening, release old Ego shattered negative personality, and create a new one, positive, kind, friendly, and loving.
I present them in the 3. book of my new book series ‘It’s Finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist: The FIRST VALID EVIDENCE in History’ in which I present religion as a madhouse, and faith as a mental illness.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: Understanding Political Manipulation Tactics
What Is Political Psychological Warfare?
Political psychological warfare involves using propaganda, disinformation, and emotional manipulation to influence public opinion and behavior.
MAGA’s enemy list creation represents textbook psychological operations designed to intimidate critics and control the narrative.
Modern psychological warfare includes social media manipulation, doxxing campaigns (publishing private or identifying information about a particular individual or group on the internet, typically with malicious intent), and coordinated harassment designed to silence opposition voices.
How Does Cult Psychology Explain MAGA Behavior?
Cult psychology reveals how authoritarian movements maintain control through psychological manipulation. MAGA exhibits classic cult characteristics, including absolute leader worship, reality denial, and persecution of dissidents.
Cult members demonstrate identical patterns:
1. Splitting between the good internal group and the evil external enemies,
2. Projection of shame onto critics, and
3. Inability to integrate complex information about leaders.
Why Do Grief Stages Get Stuck in Political Movements?
Grief psychology explains how political movements can become trapped in early stages when loss threatens core identity. MAGA supporters cannot progress through healthy grief because accepting Kirk’s extremism would destroy their worldview.
Political grief becomes pathological when group identity depends on idealized leaders. Normal grief processing requires accepting complexity, but political movements demand simplistic good/evil narratives.
Let me intervene here with a simple fact that there is no such thing as “healthy grief”.
That is just a karmic false claim. They were Evil beings, and they were obsessed with the negative energy. That is why the recommendation to grieve as “healthy” while, in fact is very harmful.
A grieving person intentionally permeates himself with the negative energy, prolonging trauma and preventing a tru,e healthy resolution of the unpleasant situation.
What to do instead? Stay positive no matter what.
What Are Defense Mechanisms in a Political Context?
Defense mechanisms protect the ego from anxiety-provoking truths through unconscious distortion. Political movements weaponize collective defense mechanisms to maintain group cohesion against threatening information.
Projection, splitting, and denial become group phenomena when shared reality faces contradictory evidence. Individual psychological defenses scale up to mass political movements like evil MAGA.
How Does Memetic Warfare Target Political Enemies?
Memetic warfare uses social media to spread propaganda and influence public opinion.
MAGA’s enemy list creation represents sophisticated memetic warfare designed to coordinate harassment campaigns against Kirk critics.
Digital psychological operations combine traditional propaganda with social media platforms to maximize reach and impact. Enemy identification becomes automated through database creation and sharing.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare – Additional Analysis: Conspiracy Theory and Superstitious Thinking
Conspiracy Theory Psychology
Enemy list creation feeds paranoid thinking patterns characteristic of conspiracy theories. Each critic becomes evidence of vast coordination against the truth. They construct elaborate networks from isolated individuals expressing normal political opinions.
Pattern-seeking behavior creates meaning from chaos while providing an illusion of understanding complex events. Conspiracy thinking offers simple explanations for complex political realities.
Christian Martyrdom Complex
Many MAGA supporters unconsciously model Kirk after Christ, persecuted for the truth, and misunderstood by the masses. Critics become Pharisees, crucifying innocence. Biblical persecution narratives justify siege mentality and enemy identification.
The religious framework provides a psychological structure for processing political loss through familiar archetypal patterns of persecution and martyrdom.
Authoritarian Personality Structure
Rigid thinking demands clear hierarchies and authority figures.
Kirk represented authority, validating their worldview. Critics threaten this authority structure, triggering typical authoritarian aggression through identification and punishment of dissent.
Authoritarian personalities cannot tolerate ambiguity or complexity. They require simple good/evil categories maintained through force if necessary.
A perfect example of domestic violence was a psycho monster and religious fanatic who demanded beating children “until they cry real tears”: James Dobson’s Death Exposes the Manipulative Empire Behind Focus on the Family’s Religious Control. James is now with Charlie Kirk on the spaceship of our space friends, waiting for Trump and his evil MAGA network to join them after the end of the planetary blockade.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare – FAQ: Understanding MAGA’s Psychological Warfare
Q: Why do MAGA supporters defend statements they claim Kirk didn’t make?
A: This contradictory behavior demonstrates unconscious recognition that Kirk’s statements were harmful, combined with a conscious inability to accept this truth. They defend evidence while denying its validity through psychological splitting.
Q: How does grief psychology explain their stuck behavior?
A: Political movements can become trapped in early grief stages when loss threatens core identity. MAGA cannot progress to acceptance because integrating Kirk’s complexity would destroy their worldview foundation.
Q: What makes this different from normal political disagreement?
A: Normal politics involves debate over policies and values. This behavior involves psychological warfare tactics, including enemy identification, harassment campaigns, and reality denial that transcend typical political discourse.
Q: Are they consciously planning psychological warfare?
A: Most participants operate unconsciously through collective defense mechanisms. However, sophisticated coordination suggests some elements involve deliberate psychological operations designed to intimidate opposition.
Q: How can people protect themselves from such tactics?
A: Understanding the psychological mechanisms helps recognize manipulation attempts. Maintaining critical thinking, seeking diverse information sources, and avoiding echo chambers provide protection against psychological warfare tactics.
This comprehensive analysis reveals how political movements weaponize unconscious psychological processes during crisis periods, transforming individual defense mechanisms into collective warfare against uncomfortable truths.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: Trump’s Hostile Rhetoric Toward Political Rivals, and Its Ripple Effect on MAGA
Donald Trump has a long history of publicly attacking his political opponents with inflammatory and often conspiratorial statements.
Below is a selection of three hostile remarks directed at each of five prominent figures: Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris.
These examples illustrate Trump’s aggressive communication style. Clearly, they show how his rhetoric sets the tone for internal MAGA dynamics, where loyalty is demanded, and betrayal is punished.
Barack Obama
- Claimed Obama was not born in the United States, promoting the “birther” conspiracy theory.
- Accused Obama of founding ISIS: “He’s the founder of ISIS, he’s the founder. He founded ISIS.”.
- Alleged Obama committed “treason” against him by spying on his campaign.
Bill Clinton
- Suggested Clinton had “a lot of problems coming up” related to Jeffrey Epstein’s island.
- Promoted the “Clinton body count” conspiracy theory, implying involvement in mysterious deaths.
- Retweeted claims that Epstein’s death was arranged by Bill Clinton.
Hillary Clinton
- Claimed Hillary “meets in secret with international banks to plot the destruction of U.S. sovereignty”.
- Accused her of giving uranium rights to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation.
- Mocked her in parody videos, saying, “Anyone could beat her, still hates me so much”.
Joe Biden
- Claimed Biden is controlled by “people in the dark shadows”.
- Allegedly, the Biden administration was prepared to kill him during the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago.
- Promoted conspiracy theories about Biden staging Osama bin Laden’s death with a body double.
Kamala Harris
- Mocked Harris in parody videos, calling her “horrendous” and suggesting she had no chance of winning.
- Claimed that Harris was part of a Marxist takeover of America.
- Repeatedly dismissed her qualifications, calling her “the worst” and “a disaster.”
Trump’s hostility toward his opponents is political, personal, relentless, and often conspiratorial.
If he treats rivals with such venom, imagine how he treats his own allies when they fail to meet his expectations. As the idol figure, Trump spreads this animosity throughout the MAGA movement, fueling internal purges and infighting.
The result?
MAGA supporters increasingly turn on one another, poisoned by the very hatred they were taught to direct outward.
From Smears to Servitude: The MAGA Loyalty Reversal
Before becoming Trump’s vice president, J.D. Vance privately described him as “America’s Hitler” in a 2016 message to a Yale Law School roommate. Vance’s words reflected deep skepticism, comparing Trump to both Nixon and Hitler.
Years later, Vance reversed course, claiming Trump’s presidency changed his mind. This dramatic shift from harsh critic to loyal second-in-command exemplifies the MAGA movement’s pattern of ideological U-turns, where past insults are buried under political expediency.
Donald Trump himself has a long history of publicly mocking those who now serve him. He once ridiculed Marco Rubio as “Little Marco,” belittled Ted Cruz’s wife and father, and called Lindsey Graham “a disgrace.”
Yet all of them eventually bent the knee, becoming vocal defenders of Trump’s agenda.
These reversals highlight a culture of submission within MAGA ranks, where former enemies become allies. Selfishly, they subordinate to Bitter Daddy, not through reconciliation, but through fear, ambition, or opportunism.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: When Loyalty Turns to Infighting
The MAGA movement, once unified under a banner of populist fervor, is now showing deep internal fractures. These conflicts reveal a pattern of betrayal, contradiction, and ideological chaos that threatens to unravel its foundations from within.
Trump vs. Pam Bondi: Loyalty on Trial
Donald Trump recently launched a scathing attack on Attorney General Pam Bondi, accusing her of failing to prosecute his political enemies with the aggression he demands.
In a Truth Social post, Trump pressured Bondi to indict figures like James Comey, Adam Schiff, and Letitia James, claiming they were “guilty as hell” despite a lack of evidence.
His demand for prosecutions without due process sparked outrage, even among MAGA loyalists. It raises concerns about authoritarian overreach and the weaponization of justice.
Bondi’s attempt to distinguish hate speech from free speech further alienated parts of the MAGA base, who saw it as a betrayal of core conservative values.
Kash Patel: From Transparency to Obstruction
Kash Patel’s trajectory within MAGA circles is marked by contradiction. As a podcaster and Trump loyalist, he once championed the full release of the Epstein files, claiming the public deserved transparency. But as FBI Director, Patel has resisted calls to disclose the same documents, citing legal constraints and national security concerns.
His evasive testimony before Congress, especially when asked whether Trump’s name appears in the files, has fueled accusations of hypocrisy and cover-up.
This reversal from whistleblower to gatekeeper has fractured trust within the movement.
J.D. Vance vs. Trump: The January 6 Divide
Vice President J.D. Vance publicly stated that violent participants in the January 6 Capitol attack “obviously shouldn’t be pardoned”. Yet on his first day in office, President Trump issued sweeping pardons, including to those convicted of assaulting police officers, without consulting Vance or offering any explanation.
This silent override of Vance’s position exposed a rift between the president and his second-in-command. Heavily, it undermined the credibility of their shared platform and leaving Vance politically humiliated.
Tom Homan: Bribery Allegations and DOJ Controversy
Tom Homan, Trump’s border czar, was caught in an undercover FBI sting, allegedly accepting $50,000 in cash from agents posing as contractors. The money was reportedly handed over in a bag from a fast-casual restaurant, with Homan promising future government contracts in return.
Although the investigation was later shut down by Trump’s DOJ, critics argue it was prematurely closed to protect a key ally. The scandal has sparked calls for accountability and further deepened the perception of corruption within MAGA’s inner circle.
When Evil Infects the Hater, Hatred Becomes Lethal
In a chilling moment that shocked viewers across the political spectrum, Fox News host Brian Kilmeade suggested on live television that mentally ill homeless people who refuse treatment should be subjected to “involuntary lethal injection” and added, “Just kill them”.
This monstrous statement, aired during a segment discussing homelessness and public safety, was met with immediate backlash from human rights advocates, political leaders, and the public.
The comment not only dehumanizes society’s most vulnerable but also exposes the extreme cruelty embedded in certain far-right narratives, where compassion is replaced by calls for extermination.
It’s a grotesque inversion of moral responsibility, punishing the poor instead of addressing systemic failures.
Kilmeade later apologized, calling his remark “extremely callous,” but the damage was done. The statement revealed a terrifying willingness to entertain state-sponsored violence against the marginalized.
Channel 4’s Truth Bomb: A Marathon of Trump’s Lies
During Donald Trump’s recent state visit to the United Kingdom, British broadcaster Channel 4 aired a bold and unprecedented special titled Trump vs. The Truth.
The program compiled over 100 documented falsehoods from Trump’s speeches, tweets, and public statements, each accompanied by fact-checks to expose the distortions.
According to Channel 4’s Chief Content Officer Ian Katz, the goal was to remind viewers “how disorienting and dangerous the world becomes when the most powerful man on earth shows little regard for the truth”.
This kind of televised accountability raises a provocative question: what if every world leader were subjected to such scrutiny?
Imagine a global standard where lies are publicly dissected in real time. How many politicians would survive the broadcast?
The fact that Trump’s supporters continue to idolize him despite this avalanche of evidence speaks volumes about the psychological mechanisms at play. It’s a textbook case of denial: MAGA followers must close both eyes to avoid seeing the damage he causes, not just to democratic norms but to truth itself.
Idol Worship in the Age of Disinformation
The Channel 4 special exposed Trump, and it also exposed the cognitive dissonance of his base.
How is it possible that millions still revere a man whose falsehoods are so thoroughly documented?
The answer lies in emotional allegiance overpowering factual reality. Trump’s supporters often dismiss criticism as partisan attacks, even when the evidence is overwhelming. They cling to the image of a strongman savior, ignoring the contradictions, reversals, and outright fabrications that define his public record.
This is political blindness and ideological self-preservation. To admit Trump’s flaws would mean confronting the possibility that their movement is built on deception. And so, denial becomes a survival strategy.
Channel 4’s broadcast was more than a media event. It was a mirror held up to a movement that refuses to see its own reflection of Evil.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare – Hypocrisy in Rhetoric: From “Fascist” Labels to Memorial Fury
Donald Trump has repeatedly labeled Vice President Kamala Harris a “fascist,” “Marxist,” and “communist”, often in the same breath.
These accusations, lacking evidence and often contradicting each other ideologically, are part of Trump’s broader strategy to define opponents with inflammatory terms.
Ironically, this comes after his running mate, J.D. Vance, publicly condemned Democrats for using the word “fascist” to describe Trump, claiming such rhetoric leads to violence.
CNN even aired a montage of Trump using the exact term Vance warned against. The contradiction reveals a double standard in MAGA messaging: what’s unacceptable from the left is routine from the right.
Following the tragic assassination of Charlie Kirk, Trump used the memorial service to blame left-wing rhetoric for Kirk’s death. He claimed that years of Nazi name-calling directed at conservatives incited terrorism.
He declared, “I hate my enemies,” a statement that starkly contradicts Christian teachings about loving one’s enemies. These teachings Trump often invokes to appeal to evangelical voters.
The moment was jarring: a political eulogy turned into a declaration of vengeance, delivered by a man who frequently holds up the Bible while disregarding its core message of compassion and forgiveness.
Free Speech for Me, Not for Thee: The CK Hypocrisy
In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s death, a disturbing trend has emerged in the United States. Individuals are losing their jobs simply for quoting or commenting on Kirk’s past statements on social media.
This is especially ironic given that Kirk was widely portrayed as a champion of free speech. Yet now, those who exercise that very freedom by repeating his own words are being punished.
It’s a glaring example of far-right hypocrisy: for them, “free speech” often means the right to insult, threaten, and demean liberals, atheists, immigrants, and LGBTQIA+ communities. But when someone echoes their rhetoric critically or even neutrally, the same speech becomes grounds for cancellation.
This symbolic punishment, firing people for referencing Kirk, is a form of ideological revenge, as if they’re being “executed” in his name.
The contradiction is staggering: the movement that claims to defend free expression is actively silencing dissent and punishing speech that doesn’t conform to its narrative. It’s not about protecting speech, it’s about controlling it.
The Kimmel Reinstatement: A Shift in the Cultural Tide
After Stephen Colbert’s departure, Jimmy Kimmel reportedly lost his job due to comments linked to Charlie Kirk and the broader MAGA backlash.
The incident was framed as part of a larger purge of liberal voices in entertainment, driven by Trump-aligned pressure. However, ABC’s decision to reinstate Kimmel marks a turning point. It signals that major corporations are beginning to resist political intimidation and reclaim editorial independence. The fear of Trump’s wrath, once paralyzing, is starting to fade.
This shift suggests a broader cultural realignment in the U.S. Companies are less afraid to stand up to MAGA orthodoxy and more willing to defend creative freedom.
The reinstatement of Kimmel is a win for one comedian and a sign that the tide may be turning against authoritarian influence in media and toward a more honest, open public discourse.
MAGA’s Psychological Warfare: When Hatred Has No Target, It Devours Itself
MAGA wars are a clear example of how Evil operates. When there is no longer an external enemy, violent individuals, such as MAGA Christian nationalists, turn on each other.
If, by some chance, extreme far-right-wingers, white supremacists, and Christian nationalists were left alone in the world, they would soon kill one another because that is what they do.
Their only inconvenience would be the absence of atheists, Black people, LGBTQIA+ individuals, Muslims, and immigrants to blame for their own bloodlust and violence.
That is how Evil works: it destroys everything, even its own.
When Earth Is the Last Stronghold of Evil
Earth remains the final planet still operating under the obsolete blueprint of the defunct Karmic Organization. Only here do malevolent dictators such as Trump, Putin, and Kim Jong Un continue to rule, amplifying hatred and unleashing violence.
Humanity alone still endures poverty, disease, crime, war, and death.
Once the blockade is lifted, we will remove all destructive political, military, and religious leaders, along with their networks, and together with other criminals, violent individuals, twisted maniacs, torturers, and murderers.
A New Dawn Awaits: Discover the Truth About the Karmicons, Other Worlds, and Your Fantastic Future
To those of you who are skeptical about the existence of the Karmic Organization, life on other planets, and the reality of incarnations, I invite you to read my article The Karmic Organization and the Karmicons: Conspiracy Theory or the Truth. Read it and discover who created you, and wrote the script for the life you’re living.
I also recommend exploring my two book series:
- It’s Finally PROVEN! God Does NOT Exist The FIRST valid EVIDENCE in History, where I present four compelling pieces of evidence showing that the existence of God is impossible.
- Letters to Palkies Messages to my friends on another planet (If the page doesn’t load the first time, simply refresh it). In this series, I recount how it all began with my romantic relationship with Sanja, my girlfriend from the planet Palki.
There are thousands of channeled messages attributed to the Karmicons (try searching “Karmic Board” or “ascended masters” on Google), and hundreds of channeled books—including The Ra Material by Carla L. Rueckert, Seth Books by Jane Roberts, Journey of Souls and Destiny of Souls by Michael Duff Newton, and The Nine Steps by Anne Givaudan and Daniel Meurois.
Although the Karmicons pre-scripted all of these messages and books, heavily redacting them and filling them with distortions, there’s still enough truth within them to reveal a disturbing picture of their dark experiments on humans and animals.
Lucid Dreaming as a Gateway: Discovering New Worlds Beyond Religion, Conflict, and Illusion
Lucid dreaming is one of the most powerful tools available for personal exploration and cosmic discovery. I strongly encourage you to learn or practice lucid dreaming and use it to verify my claims through your own direct experience.
Read my article Lucid Dreaming for Space Travel: Exploring Real Planets in Dreams, and share what you’ve learned from the humans you encounter in your nightly journeys to dream worlds that are replicas of the real planets.
On the new planets free of the Evil Karmic Organization, the landscape of life is radically different. There are no religions, no racial divisions, no LGBTQIA+ identities, no political parties, no democracy, no elections, no slavery, no immigration, no addictions, no crime, no violence, no wars, no suffering, and no death.
Animals are no longer killed for food or clothing. Replicators powered by free, clean ambient energy produce everything needed for daily life. The inhabitants are white men and women, heterosexual, civil, free, and equal, enjoying full human rights without exception.
I understand this may sound fantastical. But once the planetary blockade is lifted, you’ll be astonished to discover that it’s all true. I guarantee you that your future is far more extraordinary than you ever imagined.
Exposing the Far-Right Psyche: A Topical Cluster on Trump, MAGA, and the Collapse of Democracy in the USA
This article is part of an ongoing topical cluster exploring the psychological, karmic, and symbolic dimensions of far-right ideology and its messianic fixation on Donald Trump. Together with the pieces “Who Really Killed Charlie Kirk? Senad Dizdarevic Reveals the Shocking Karmic Truth Behind the Assassination,” “Trump Narcissistic Personality Disorder: How MAGA’s Messiah Complex Drives Christian Nationalist Theocracy,”and “Donald Trump Hannibal Lecter: Strange Bond Between Trump and Cannibal,” this series exposes the deeper psycho-political mechanisms driving Christian nationalist theocracy, narcissistic delusion, and karmic entrapment. More articles in this cluster are coming soon, expanding the analysis and offering tools for awakening and liberation.
Related articles:
Who will be the new Pope: Trump, incarnated Christ, and AntiChrist?
Apologetics and the Defense of Evil Yahweh’s Lies and Violence
James Dobson’s Death Exposes the Manipulative Empire Behind Focus on the Family’s Religious Control
Atheist Vs Theist Debate Tactics: Biblical Quote Bombardments On Medium
Christian Apologetic Manipulation Tactics: Psychological Tricks in Religious Debates